From users-return-7097-apmail-trafficserver-users-archive=trafficserver.apache.org@trafficserver.apache.org Mon May 14 14:03:58 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9A7C183B5 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47763 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2018 14:03:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 47685 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2018 14:03:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 47666 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2018 14:03:58 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BF21CC0111; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:03:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id adhLIdWbVJje; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com (mail-qk0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CEDF75F397; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s70-v6so10025356qks.13; Mon, 14 May 2018 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ug7gD3lhfbN797FebrSKBVCfk89i/+no2lREw4recDo=; b=nAVMzAKCI8gQ6j4PB4RJaNDK7P7wqxoJCnNpOiwuHT7waEEieYY2tuRFH9Jfrsbqyr 5NNGEClogeKCExeCiCRn+XUU9jA6P/38R4VhBDWgTeqMQKMDtNMOGG7gdB7CjjkBsiYX hqMZgR2PWMGoT2kKsiLS/YxOphHRFlP2kCOCOCYknynuR8ROauke/lr70RSkxU62W2vO yydpmiHNWUPKFyqKN8kL+a/qn/VzVigAbnvc8s00kwK3ot7ZxmSP2Ps/6p1lmlFyVCir Js/XQyF2icKNGTdK4qNz7UUGSuGnWIsEUrqpsrpNZJ0VFDWz/ECN3Td3thb8j8tBRJyW jbQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ug7gD3lhfbN797FebrSKBVCfk89i/+no2lREw4recDo=; b=KQ7oMSnQoT8ISlTHa9qyDyE0xyKfHfJg3VIEzF1RsAEIoZln+I+I/P1fNvETarrG89 VqfzttUaeP1DBzIh2zDYX3ohBXS9UW6Oh8FA6cCL88LRWRriGdbZctANDV5epk9K/0Je lFU80pxDl75w1HurGczgf0GR+ELLfxJOw8u42IpFDN4ajT4LtHDnp6c3Df9GXJaTc37t +DE5EpUhqRBTQkwIUOkiu/N7HQuKv4L4X37+XWpjnJ+hz+YFofu3OcMrLyTpQSix6tZP gOGYJqeQKC4orio471syZFSs7EZPOKPKAAApgS2bOfOKQBNXeiuJh5fS1kcN9iaPe2AS 3u6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweD+SkflvdStXzmNEG4PUiRx1BLk459N+0kJSPWwCNK/LKC7iXz W6wwRwiNw5CmlWoqn2JilmBibiC0v5drAqhlpy4dPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZra5zxy3hNyDOLcupUImwzBxaN5FLrQO/18HywZI+N5rwJ9nmNi9+0PjfdZVMBL42BqqyZZARWg6d5NwNPQxXg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:7047:: with SMTP id l68-v6mr8160498qkc.263.1526306624797; Mon, 14 May 2018 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.246.139 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) From: salil GK Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 19:33:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Crash - looks like 1765 - To: users@trafficserver.apache.org, dev@trafficserver.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello I am using ATS 6.2.2 and found a crash happening in TransformVConnection::do_io_close:467. This looks like bug 1765. But while looking at that bug - it looks like that defect is not resolved completely. Stack trace from my machine is as follows >>> #1 0x00007f42727282a8 in _Unwind_Backtrace () from /lib/x86_64/libgcc_s.so.1 #2 0x00007f427245fa88 in backtrace () from /lib/x86_64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007f4274c9bd7f in ink_stack_trace_dump () at ink_stack_trace.cc:61 #4 0x00007f4274c9e2f3 in signal_crash_handler (signo=11) at signals.cc:180 #5 0x00005575fdf9f68a in crash_logger_invoke (signo=11, info=0x7f427174e630, ctx=0x7f427174e500) at Crash.cc:169 #6 #7 0x00000000000000b8 in ?? () #8 0x00005575fdff8b5e in TransformVConnection::do_io_close (this=0x5575ff57eb20, error=20600) at Transform.cc:467 #9 0x00005575fe08d691 in HttpTunnel::chain_abort_all (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at HttpTunnel.cc:1444 #10 0x00005575fe03761a in HttpSM::tunnel_handler_post_ua (this=0x7f426a9d41b0, event=104, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at HttpSM.cc:3505 #11 0x00005575fe08cdeb in HttpTunnel::producer_handler (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, p=0x7f426a9d56e8) at HttpTunnel.cc:1240 #12 0x00005575fe08dc3b in HttpTunnel::main_handler (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, data=0x5575ff201e18) at HttpTunnel.cc:1623 #13 0x00005575fdfa282f in Continuation::handleEvent (this=0x7f426a9d54e8, event=104, data=0x5575ff201e18) at ../iocore/eventsystem/I_Continuation.h:153 #14 0x00005575fe1f9a08 in read_signal_and_update (event=104, vc=0x5575ff201d00) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:148 #15 0x00005575fe1f9da1 in read_signal_done (event=104, nh=0x7f4271858cd0, vc=0x5575ff201d00) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:209 #16 0x00005575fe1fa61f in read_from_net (nh=0x7f4271858cd0, vc=0x5575ff201d00, thread=0x7f4271855010) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:359 #17 0x00005575fe1fc78a in UnixNetVConnection::net_read_io (this=0x5575ff201d00, nh=0x7f4271858cd0, lthread=0x7f4271855010) at UnixNetVConnection.cc:933 #18 0x00005575fe1f0bc1 in NetHandler::mainNetEvent (this=0x7f4271858cd0, event=5, e=0x5575ff06ec40) at UnixNet.cc:513 #19 0x00005575fdfa282f in Continuation::handleEvent (this=0x7f4271858cd0, event=5, data=0x5575ff06ec40) at ../iocore/eventsystem/I_Continuation.h:153 #20 0x00005575fe21fe1f in EThread::process_event (this=0x7f4271855010, e=0x5575ff06ec40, calling_code=5) at UnixEThread.cc:148 #21 0x00005575fe22037c in EThread::execute (this=0x7f4271855010) at UnixEThread.cc:275 #22 0x00005575fe21f312 in spawn_thread_internal (a=0x5575ff03ee10) at Thread.cc:86 #23 0x00007f4272ecb633 in start_thread (arg=0x7f4271753700) at pthread_create.c:463 #24 0x00007f427245198f in clone () from /lib/x86_64/libc.so.6 <<<<<< What can I do to handle this ... Can I apply the solution mentioned in that bug in my 6.2.2 source. Thanks in advance ~S