uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Lally" <ala...@alum.rpi.edu>
Subject Re: naming releases
Date Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:12:25 GMT
On 11/13/06, eddie_epstein@aewatercolors.com
<eddie_epstein@aewatercolors.com> wrote:
> >Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them?  I
> >think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
> >because:
> >
> >1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
> >work is on Apache
> >2) it signals that Apache UIMA is the release that follows UIMA 2.0
> >3) it signals that Apache UIMA is not vastly different in concepts from
> >UIMA 2.0
> >(by not being called 3.0, for instance).
> I strongly agree with this. Given the expectation that the existing v1.x
> release will be around for some time, no reason to confuse the world with
> two version 1's.

I don't feel strongly about this so I won't object to calling it v2.1.


View raw message