uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Lally" <ala...@alum.rpi.edu>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-18) Placeholder for Architectural Cleanups / Changes
Date Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:49:31 GMT
On 11/14/06, Thilo Goetz <twgoetz@gmx.de> wrote:
> I'm sort of thinking along the same lines.  I would not have thought of
> using Jira like this -- which is not to say that this is wrong in any
> way, it's just not what I understood by an issue tracking system.  To my
> mind, things go into Jira if it's either a bug, or some new feature that
> has previously been discussed on uima-dev.

I think that a "feature request" in JIRA could be opened by a user who
wants that feature.  It doesn't need to have been discussed on
uima-dev.

I think I basically agree with Marshall that we can use JIRA to keep
track of any kind of issue that we think needs to be addressed, even
if there's no consensus on how it should be addressed at the time.
(Even for a bug, there might not be a consensus on how to fix it.)

-Adam

Mime
View raw message