From uima-dev-return-14-apmail-incubator-uima-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Nov 03 14:06:34 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 11764 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 14:06:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 14:06:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 42297 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2006 14:06:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42281 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2006 14:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact uima-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42249 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2006 14:06:16 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:06:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lally.adam@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:06:02 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so529969uge for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:05:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=VC+wS7AXnKIrdk4Ye2JZ9wproVvGXQqd04nBhO9Y2KGEvvlxM2sG2aQhF/AqFpRZ7oRpARNHHEt7fRSMH4o9A6Kmf2M/7XzvzA5rVBvsqE5nSG0subk+60kKmCVODKP231n0GCzpHbNGeK4q4dyVqTSBZ0/wT0KROLdF+Vl9Llc= Received: by 10.78.83.13 with SMTP id g13mr2845173hub.1162562740413; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.128.1 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:05:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2787e08a0611030605v30d188c7n8aff8df87d9282c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:05:40 -0500 From: "Adam Lally" Sender: lally.adam@gmail.com To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: standardizing namespaces for the UIMA framework In-Reply-To: <454AEC90.1020800@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16458_16554898.1162562740264" References: <454AC343.8050803@schor.com> <454AEC90.1020800@gmx.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: fad401eb2f087cf9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_16458_16554898.1162562740264 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/3/06, Thilo Goetz wrote: > > I would think the org.uima namespace should be reserved for standardized > UIMA interfaces, originating most likely from OASIS. Then our > implementation prefix would still be org.apache. Other Apache projects > that implement standards are handling this similarly. For example, some > of the interfaces that Xerces implements have a org.xml or org.w3c > namespace; the implementation is still prefixed with org.apache. > > Our interfaces are certainly good candidates for such a standardized > interfaces, but I'd wait with renaming to a org.uima (or similar) > namespace until such a proposal is forthcoming from OASIS. > +1 ------=_Part_16458_16554898.1162562740264--