uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: Eclipse update site for Apache UIMA tooling
Date Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:36:05 GMT
I added a testcase for the update site to our test plan.  And when I
tested it, it failed...  but it's now fixed.  Problem was that there
were several more files (feature.xml, site.xml) that had hardcoded in
them the previous (wrong) version number.


Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> The "site.xml" file in the project uimaj-eclipse-update-site had to have
>> a value stating where the update site is located.  It currently says:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/eclipse-update-site
>> Part of our release process needs to move the files from the
>> uimaj-eclipse-update-site/target directory to that update site.
> Seems to be a similar step as moving some release artifacts to the
> maven repository.
>> I think that our set of released artifacts that should be
>> scanned-with-RAT / reviewed should include the artifacts for the update
>> site.  Do others agree?
>> If so, can Michael add a directory for the update site artifacts to the
>> release candidate at
>> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03 , or something
>> else that's better?
> I added the update site artifacts to
> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03/eclipseUpdateSite
>> Unless someone wants to offer contrary opinions, I'll post to
>> general@incubator a question about having our next release include an
>> eclipse update site, and if its OK to have it at the
>> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/eclipse-update-site
>> location.  I see that other projects do this kind of thing.  But I've
>> also seen that all "distributions" have to be in specific places.
> Fine with me. Go ahead a ask on the incubator list.
> I think if we have now an update site, we should also add a test case
> to the test plan for this.
> -- Michael

View raw message