uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Baessler <...@michael-baessler.de>
Subject Re: Release Upload
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:38:42 GMT
Adam Lally wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 12:19 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>   
>> So - my preference would be mostly one of "don't care", but with a very
>> slight leaning toward having the release event result in the creation of
>> a new subdir under d/i/uima/<release-identification> and under that, the
>> set of files that go with that release; with files that don't change
>> with each release, like KEYS, at the top.  Such an organization would
>> allow a user browsing the directories to download both the binary and
>> source releases for a particular version, perhaps slightly more easily.
>>
>> I can also see the value of top level "binaries, source, docs"
>> organization, because a user browsing the directory would likely have in
>> mind one of these things they want to go after (although, that might run
>> into difficulties if we distribute things that don't fall into these
>> categories, at some point).
>>
>>     
>
> I also see value both ways.  But given that ant, commons, and httpd do
> it with the top-level "binaries, source, docs" organization, my
> (slight) preference would be to do it that way.  If there are any
> users who actually go poking around directly in dist/incubator, it
> would be nice for them if there was some consistency.
>
> -Adam
>   
Let's stop discussing and make progress :-) Which way should we go. I 
think Adam is right, we should do it the most common way.
So do you all agree with my preview layout?

-- Michael

Mime
View raw message