uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Tanenblatt <sloth...@park-slope.net>
Subject Re: ConceptMapper update
Date Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:49:04 GMT
No problem, I didn't realize that, but it makes sense.

Let me know what I can do to help get this thing finally released.  
I'll be able to put a little time in here and there at this point, so  
I will be more helpful and responsive, I hope.



On Mar 11, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:

> Thanks for the patch.  The name of the patch file does not
> matter at all.  Some people name it after the Jira issue,
> but that's not important.
>
> Please see my comment about not sending a single patch for
> several issues, but that's just for future reference.
>
> --Thilo
>
> Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
>> OK, I know I promised an update a while ago, but the holidays and  
>> work
>> commitments just took over my time. I am *finally* ready with a patch
>> that includes a small code change, but more importantly,  
>> documentation!
>> I created a patch file and will attach it to a JIRA issue, just
>> wondering if there is some naming convention for these patch files. I
>> would love to get this thing finally released, as it has been  
>> lingering
>> for way too long.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the update, that are good news!
>>>
>>> -- Michael
>>>
>>> Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
>>>> Just to followup on the comment about ConceptMapper: I am in the  
>>>> process
>>>> of putting together documentation right now, and hope to have  
>>>> that done
>>>> by the end of this week. There is also a code change that was  
>>>> requested
>>>> by someone that I want to make, and then I will do whatever I  
>>>> need to do
>>>> to get ConceptMapper released (as I learn the necessary  
>>>> steps...). I
>>>> have really just been so overwhelmed by other projects to close  
>>>> out the
>>>> year that I just had to put ConceptMapper on pause.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I'm late... thanks for the reminder.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a +0 from my side.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me explain why I'm not so convinced about this submission  
>>>>> into the
>>>>> Sandbox.
>>>>> If I follow the discussion threads it seems to me very similar  
>>>>> to the
>>>>> ConceptMapper submission we
>>>>> had in June 2008. There we added the coded after some  
>>>>> discussions to
>>>>> the Sandbox and now it is there
>>>>> and nothing (if I check the SVN history) happened after the  
>>>>> initial
>>>>> import. That is from my side a
>>>>> little bit disappointing. E.g. adding documentation to show the
>>>>> benefit, merging code with
>>>>> DictionaryAnnotator concepts, adding some tests to see if all  
>>>>> works
>>>>> fine...
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want to block the submission of CFE into the Sandbox, I  
>>>>> just
>>>>> want to share my thoughts.
>>>>> Maybe it works better this time.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>>>> Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature  
>>>>>> Extractor
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> the sandbox.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a
>>>>>> request
>>>>>> for a Jira submission.  The original did not have  
>>>>>> documentation.  The
>>>>>> submission has now been updated and documentation included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 accept CAS viewer source code into sandbox
>>>>>> [ ] 0 don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 don't accept, I still have issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Mime
View raw message