uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: slight restructuring of SVN when we graduate
Date Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:46:12 GMT
On 3/9/2010 4:16 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Does that mean we no longer have to copy sanbox projects
> to uimaj to build them?  I would love that.
>   

yes, that is the intent - I would love that too...  -Marshall
> --Thilo
>
> On 3/8/2010 19:37, Marshall Schor wrote:
>   
>> When we graduate, I think it would be a good idea to slightly
>> restructure our SVN layout, moving the trunk/branches/tags designation
>> to one level higher for the uimaj, uima-as, and sandbox projects.
>>
>> That is, the new layout would look something like:
>>
>> .../uima/trunk
>>               /uimaj (Java SDK)
>>               /uima-as (add-on to above
>>               /sandbox
>>               /superPoms  <new directory to hold various parent poms>
>>               /sharedBuildTools <or maybe a better name>
>>         /branches
>>         /tags
>>
>> The branches and tags can have just parts of the trunk copied to them,
>> or they can have the whole trunk.  The Apache Release plugin works with
>> this structure; for instance, if you want to release just
>> sandbox/projectXXX the release plugin would copy sandbox/projectXXX to
>> the tag, not the entire trunk.  (I haven't tried this, but that's the
>> impression I get from reading.)
>>
>> The goal of this is to allow checking out the "trunk" to check out
>> everything, as well as allow checking out any specific sub-part(s) of
>> interest (e.g., one sandbox project), and have a consistent layout in
>> working store that matches the SVN.  This will enable a more
>> straight-forward build process, and allow us to use more standard Maven
>> tooling.
>>
>> The sharedBuildTools would be tooling (such as DocBook tools) needed for
>> building, but not something that is part of normal distributions or
>> releases.  (It *could* be released, as a separate component, if that was
>> desired).  (It can also be included in the tag - to preserve a
>> particular version of the tooling used to build a release).
>>
>> Any opinions pro/con moving to this kind of layout, when we move out of
>> the incubator?
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>              
>>     
>
>   

Mime
View raw message