uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject [VOTE] Release all remaining build artifacts
Date Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:33:54 GMT
 The remaining build artifacts have been released in a series of 4 staged
releases, all to be voted on.

This is the first release of these artifacts (version 1 was canceled).

Jira's fixed:


    Sub-task

    * [UIMA-1757 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1757>] -
      use docbkx to create docbooks in place of current docbook tools
      project
    * [UIMA-1758 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1758>] -
      remove dependency on checked-out other projects
    * [UIMA-1759 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1759>] -
      make project versioning more conventional
    * [UIMA-1763 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1763>] -
      Switch to using Nexus for releasing


    Bug

    * [UIMA-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1051>] -
      doc build not working on Linux
    * [UIMA-1805 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1805>] -
      change aggregate for build projects version to follow version
      convention for those
    * [UIMA-1806 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1806>] -
      fixes for releasing, in build poms
    * [UIMA-1813 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1813>] -
      aggregate parent pom build fails rat test


    Improvement

    * [UIMA-1814 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1814>] -
      Try making release:prepare work with all build projects by adding
      in relative-path


    Task

    * [UIMA-1755 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1755>] -
      Improve Maven build
    * [UIMA-1816 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1816>] -
      update parent-pom-top references to version 2



The release is staged in 4 staging repositories:

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-008/

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-010/

Suggested way to test: add this to your maven "settings" in the
<profiles> section:

    <profile>
      <id>staged-release</id>
      <repositories>
        <repository>
          <id>staged-release</id>
         
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051/</url>
        </repository>
        <repository>
          <id>staged-release2</id>
         
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-008/</url>
        </repository>
        <repository>
          <id>staged-release3</id>
         
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-010/</url>
        </repository>
        <repository>
          <id>staged-release4</id>
         
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-011/</url>
        </repository>
      </repositories>
      <pluginRepositories>
        <pluginRepository>
          <id>staged-release-plugin</id>
         
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-051/</url>
        </pluginRepository>
      </pluginRepositories>
    </profile>       

Note that all 4 staging repos are listed, and one is listed as a
pluginRepository, too, because its contents are referenced by some build tooling.

The trunk has already been updated to change references to these POMs to use the
to-be-released version, ready for testing with these staging repositories, when
you use the maven parameter -Pstaged-release to activate this profile.  For example:

  mvn install -Pstaged-release

More background on this approach is here:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Also, please inspect the release artifacts to insure they have the
proper license /notice files.

Vote open for 72 hours. 

It would be very good to approve this quickly, because until the release
happens, other people may have errors when building (because they will refer to
the to-be-released versions), unless they use the same "settings.xml" setup
described above.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

Thanks for your help in checking/verifying, in advance!

-Marshall Schor



Mime
View raw message