uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Lally <ala...@alum.rpi.edu>
Subject Re: JIRA UIMA-2217 breaks backwards compatibility
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:35:57 GMT
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:

> One question (which may be very difficult to answer) is what is the impact
> of
> changing these interfaces?
> If no one is using them, other than our internal code, then there's little
> impact. Given the nature of these, is there a chance that some adopter of
> the
> UIMA framework has implemented their own versions of implementations of
> these
> interfaces?  (My sense is that is it is very unlikely that anyone has
> implemented these interfaces other than our code.)

I tend to agree that it's unlikely someone has their own implementation of
these.  But I guess you never know.

Does using these for JMX purposes increase the likelyhood of trouble here?
> No, I don't think so.  (Actually the other idea of creating two different
...MBean interfaces for the same object seems like it might cause some
trouble with JMX.)


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message