From dev-return-17962-apmail-uima-dev-archive=uima.apache.org@uima.apache.org Fri Nov 30 15:49:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99B7DD4D3 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73027 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 15:49:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 72914 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 15:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 72891 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2012 15:48:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:48:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msa@schor.com designates 69.56.236.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.56.236.19] (HELO gateway01.websitewelcome.com) (69.56.236.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:48:49 +0000 Received: by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 3193498E75870; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:48:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from gator74.hostgator.com (gator74.hostgator.com [184.173.199.208]) by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268CA98E75831 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:48:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from [129.34.20.23] (port=49491 helo=[9.2.211.172]) by gator74.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TeSpI-00042H-OQ for dev@uima.apache.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:48:28 -0600 Message-ID: <50B8D547.3040709@schor.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:48:23 -0500 From: Marshall Schor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@uima.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace update site with composite repository References: <50B78DF9.5070609@uni-wuerzburg.de> In-Reply-To: <50B78DF9.5070609@uni-wuerzburg.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator74.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - uima.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schor.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([9.2.211.172]) [129.34.20.23]:49491 X-Source-Auth: msa+schor.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: bWlzY2hvcjttaXNjaG9yO2dhdG9yNzQuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think before voting +1, it is important to attempt reproduce the "build" of this. To that end, can we get some update(s) to our web site that describes how to do this? I'm wondering, for instance, if the "one-time-setup" page needs updating, for the Eclipse part (which currently says to use an older version of the m2e eclipse plugin). And the page "release" describes how to build the eclipse update site. But I'm guessing it now needs some additions to cover whatever the new process is. Can that be updated? I guess the updates would need to be temporarily labeled to indicate they are for a pending new style of the update site. I haven't yet had a chance to look at the changes yet. I hope to get to this soon, maybe this weekend :-). -Marshall On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > this vote is about replacing the current update site with a composite > repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before. > > We discussed in UIMA-2475 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475) > that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 repositories. > This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built with Tycho. > The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository, which refers > to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently published update > site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0) containing > the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these artifacts are > provided twice. > > The new update site (composite repository) is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > [ ] 0 Don't care > > PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all parts > mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html > >