uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Replace update site with composite repository
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:52:21 GMT
Ups...

+1

There is one thing that I wanted to mention: The signings for the new p2 
repository is missing. This should be done before the complete folder is 
copied to the server.

Peter

On 17.12.2012 15:47, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Here is my +1.
>
> You should vote yourself also, especially when you open the vote.
>
> Jörn
>
> On 12/17/2012 03:42 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Just a gentle reminder that this vote is still pending.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> On 06.12.2012 17:24, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I updated the website (at least I think I have, according to the 
>>> HOWTO file).
>>> The build process is a bit cumbersome, but probably fool-proof.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 30.11.2012 16:55, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> I completely agree and will prepare the necessary changes (this 
>>>> weekend or next week)
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> On 30.11.2012 16:48, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>>> I think before voting +1, it is important to attempt reproduce the 
>>>>> "build" of
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> To that end, can we get some update(s) to our web site that 
>>>>> describes how to do
>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm wondering, for instance, if the "one-time-setup" page needs 
>>>>> updating, for
>>>>> the Eclipse part (which currently says to use an older version of 
>>>>> the m2e
>>>>> eclipse plugin).
>>>>>
>>>>> And the page "release" describes how to build the eclipse update 
>>>>> site.  But I'm
>>>>> guessing it now needs some additions to cover whatever the new 
>>>>> process is.  Can
>>>>> that be updated?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess the updates would need to be temporarily labeled to 
>>>>> indicate they are
>>>>> for a pending new style of the update site.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't yet had a chance to look at the changes yet.  I hope to 
>>>>> get to this
>>>>> soon, maybe this weekend :-).
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this vote is about replacing the current update site with a 
>>>>>> composite
>>>>>> repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We discussed in UIMA-2475 
>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475)
>>>>>> that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 
>>>>>> repositories.
>>>>>> This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built 
>>>>>> with Tycho.
>>>>>> The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository,

>>>>>> which refers
>>>>>> to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently 
>>>>>> published update
>>>>>> site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0)

>>>>>> containing
>>>>>> the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these 
>>>>>> artifacts are
>>>>>> provided twice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new update site (composite repository) is here:
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site

>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>> [ ] 0   Don't care
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all

>>>>>> parts
>>>>>> mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message