uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Replace update site with composite repository
Date Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:54:23 GMT
Hi,

I want to push this issue a bit.

What do we need to change for a new vote?

Marshall, do you want to restructure the update sites in SVN?

Best,

Peter


On 19.12.2012 14:17, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19.12.2012 06:27, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I'm just now having a chance to look at this (sorry for the delay).
>>
>> Some initial questions:
>>
>> As part of this update, the UIMA SVN has a new top-level folder, 
>> parallel with
>> uimaj, uima-as, etc., called eclipse-packagings.
>>
>> I noticed this folder is missing the normal trunk/tags/branches 
>> subfolders.  It
>> would seem to me that we should have those, and when a new packaging 
>> is done, it
>> would have a version, and be "tagged", like a release.
>>
>> I realize it may not be considered a release (because it's just a 
>> re-packaging
>> of the already released Jars) but it still seems to me that we should 
>> have a
>> trunk and a tags for this, and tag what we promote out.
>>
>> Another question:  There's a pom at the top level of the folder
>> eclipse-packagings.  It says its for artifact "eclipse-packagings", 
>> and has a
>> version number of "4".
>>
>> I would think it would have a version number of "1", since it's the 
>> first
>> version being released.
>
> I agree on all points. One thing I want to mention: We need some 
> strategy for the version number as this packaging will probably 
> contain releases with different version numbers, e.g., uima-2.4.0 and 
> hopefully uima-textmarker-2.0.0
> Therefore the number will be increased with asynchronous releases.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>> More later...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this vote is about replacing the current update site with a composite
>>> repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before.
>>>
>>> We discussed in UIMA-2475 
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475)
>>> that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 
>>> repositories.
>>> This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built with 
>>> Tycho.
>>> The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository, 
>>> which refers
>>> to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently 
>>> published update
>>> site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0) 
>>> containing
>>> the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these artifacts are
>>> provided twice.
>>>
>>> The new update site (composite repository) is here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site

>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> [ ] 0   Don't care
>>>
>>> PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all parts
>>> mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html
>>>
>>>


Mime
View raw message