uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker Release Candidate 1
Date Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:46:29 GMT
On 24.01.2013 12:20, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> I found the icons in the uimaj-ep-textmarker-ide binary plugin jar 
>>> file, but
>>> the LICENSE and NOTICE files do not contain the attribution and 
>>> license for them:
>> Hmm, yes. I thought it is enough to provide those modified files for 
>> the root project, which is released. I assume that maven has put the 
>> standard LICENSE/NOTICE files in META-INF. The question is: what do I 
>> need to do? Does each jar needs its individual files? 
> I am afraid to tell you that you need to have accurate NOTICE/LICENSE 
> files for all the artifacts you want to distribute.
> As far as I know you can tell maven to not follow the standard 
> behavior, I believe Marshall already did it for
> some of our artifacts already, e.g. the Cas Editor.

Can you or Marhsall elaborate on that? I looked at the Cas Editor, but 
have not found anything in the pom nor in the jar distributed in the 
downloadable archive.

Can I simply put a manually adapted NOTICE/LICENSE file in the META-INF 
folder of the respective projects? Or what is the normal procedure here?

> See this release policy:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distribute-other-artifacts
> The attribution and notices you included in the svn tag files look good,
> you just need to make sure that they are included in all of your 
> artifacts you want
> to distribute. The basic principle here is that you just include what 
> is mandatory.
> The textmarker ide plugin jar file includes the icons, and uses ANTLR 
> libraries through
> the textmarker engine. For the LICENSE and NOTICE file it only counts 
> what is inside the distributable,
> in this case you only need to put the icons in the LICENSE/NOTICE but 
> not ANTLR because their
> work is not included.
> The NOTICE file in the svn tag still has 2012 in it, should be updated 
> to 2013.

Thanks for your help :-)


> Hope that helps,
> Jörn

View raw message