uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: license display in the Eclipse update site installer
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 05:18:55 GMT
This seems wrong in several ways, as I study more how Eclipse uses these.
So ignore this :-).

See other part of this thread that discussed this further, and Jira UIMA-2636.

-Marshall
On 2/4/2013 4:10 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> It seems to me that the license displayed in the Eclipse update site installer
> is typically shorter than the full Apache license, and includes a link to the
> full license.  I don't recall the pros/cons here.
>
> For instance, the "short" version used in the uimaj plugins is:
>
> Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor
> license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for
> additional information regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this
> file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not
> use this file except in compliance with the License.  You may obtain a copy of
> the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.  Unless required by
> applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License
> is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
> KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the specific language
> governing permissions and limitations under the License.
>
> The version used in textmarker is the full text, including the appendix on how
> to apply the Apache license to other works.  I think, in any case, that Appendix
> should be omitted here.
>
> This is not a blocker, in my opinion, however.
>
> -Marshall
>
>


Mime
View raw message