uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Eclipse UIMA tooling in 3.7.2 - works for me
Date Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:45:00 GMT
I tried as follows:

1) installed a new copy of Eclipse 3.7.2 (64 bit, windows)

2) ran the install-new-software, pointed to the site generated by running the
eclipse update site build

(I don't know if drop-in works, because the install requires some prereqs like
EMF tools; I don't know if these get installed when you do the drop-in).

3) made a new project, and made a new analysis engine descriptor in that
project, which opened fine in the Component Descriptor Editor.


On 7/2/2013 10:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I did not check the update site when I reviewed the rc.
> However, I observed such problems when I tried to use the new runtime
> plugin in Eclipse 3.7.2. (a few days ago)
> Best,
> Peter
> On 02.07.2013 16:03, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> I checked out the rc tag and built it: ok. (mvn clean install)
>> I updated my local uimaj checkout, updated it to use the rc and built: ok. (mvn clean
>> I installed the resulting Eclipse plugins in my Eclipse (dropins folder) and tried
to open a type system in the component editor: ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.uima.resource.metadata.ResourceMetaData.
>> Can anybody confirm this?
>> -- Richard
>> Am 01.07.2013 um 17:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com>:
>>> On 7/1/2013 11:03 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> On 7/1/2013 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> On 01.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/1/2013 8:50 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>> Will there be another rc or should we still test the current
>>>>>> I may have missed something - I haven't seen any issues yet needing
fixing in
>>>>>> these artifacts.  I've removed the "excess" projects from the SVN
tag, to reduce
>>>>>> confusion (they were put there by the maven release plugin).
>>>>> Nevermind, I did not know whether this modification causes a new
>>>>> vote/rc. If there is still need for one more, I will cast my vote
>>>>> tomorrow after some reviewing.
>>>> There is so far just 1 +1 vote (mine).   Need 2 more :-)
>>> Richard may have voted +1, or may have just said +1 to my suggestion to remove
>>> the extra projects in the tag - Richard can you clarify? 
>>> Thanks.
>>> -Marshall

View raw message