uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <richard.eck...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: I'm thinking it would be good to do a 2.4.2 SDK bug fix release?
Date Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:53:07 GMT
Most of the time I override the Maven release plugin default ;)

In a three-segment version (x.y.z), I tend to adopt the following scheme:

The x-segment, I use for major features and/or incompatible changes. Hence
a lot of changes in uimaFIT had to wait for the upcoming 2.0.0 release.

The y-segment, I use for normal feature releases. Depending on the project
that may or may not include incompatible changes. For a rather stable
project like uimaFIT, a y-segment increase should not include incompatible

The z-segment, I reserve for bugfix releases (stuff necessary between feature
releases because of oversights, unexpected issues, etc.) A bugfix release
should never include incompatible changes. It may fix incompatible changes
accidentially introduced in a y-segment release.

I think the 2.4.1 release definitely has a different quality than the
bugfix 2.4.2 release. I've seen people add an extra digit in such cases
( Artifactory versions had such cases in the past. But I don't
know the rationale behind their 3-segment versions.

It may be good to document a versioning guideline for UIMA somewhere.


-- Richard

Am 01.08.2013 um 19:14 schrieb Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com>:

> On 8/1/2013 12:29 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Sounds good. 
>> I wonder about the UIMA versioning scheme. Since there is a three-part
>> versioning scheme, I'd have expected that the last digit is reserved for
>> bug-fix releases (like this one) and that the 2.5.0 may have been a
>> better name for the 2.4.1 release. How does the UIMA versioning scheme work?
> Here's my guess on how this works:
> People by default bump up the release number by .1 (actually, doing a mvn
> release:prepare defaults to this).
> That's where it stays, unless someone gets motivated to change it to something else.
> We typically haven't done big jumps (like raising the 2nd digit) unless there
> are major changes.
> I do think that the 2.4.1 release had enough new stuff to merit the 2.5.0
> designation, but I don't think anyone focused on that.
> -Marshall
>> -- Richard
>> Am 01.08.2013 um 17:22 schrieb Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com>:
>>> I'm thinking it would best for the UIMA users if we were to do a 2.4.2 Java SDK
>>> release soon (in the next week or so?) to fix the 7 issues that popped up when
>>> we got the 2.4.1 SDK out into the community.
>>> WDYT?
>>> The issues:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.4.2SDK%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
>>> -Marshall

View raw message