uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: Jenkins, we have a problem - with Java 5
Date Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:56:40 GMT
So... just to pick up the result of the discussion:

We will probably switch all modules to a newer Java version next year
and the upcoming ruta release should still be based on Java 5, right?

Best,

Peter



On 29.07.2013 15:29, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Clarifying:
>
> I develop in Java 7 :-).  I was depending on our Jenkins runs to point out
> anthing that "snuck" into the build that had dependencies on Java 6 or 7.
>
> The downside for changing the prerequisite to Java 7 would be that there might
> be some customers of UIMA who are currently running it on Java 6, just fine, in
> deployments, who, when they upgraded to the next level of UIMA, would find it
> necessary to upgrade to Java 7. 
>
> I'm aware of at least one major corporation that uses UIMA inside products it
> ships, that is on Java 1.6 (although, I suspect they will be moving to Java 7 at
> some point in the future, of course).
>
> So, it's a matter of potentially "forcing" customers to upgrade to Java 7.
>
> I'm not sure this is a real issue, with customers, which is why I've asked on
> the users list.
>
> If we get a sense that Java 7 is fine with all customers who are upgrading, then
> I'm fine with switching to 7; maybe that's the right target, if we advertise and
> set the switch date for mid-next-year.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
> On 7/29/2013 6:09 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>> On 07/28/2013 06:15 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> If that's the case, then probably a good idea is to publicize the upcoming
>>> switch with a quite long lead time, so that users get an ample chance to prepare
>>> and/or raise concerns.
>> If we do such an investigation we should also check what impact a switch to
>> Java 7 would have.
>> Maybe we can directly switch to Java 7?
>>
>> Jörn
>>


Mime
View raw message