uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: javadoc generating conventions
Date Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:53:44 GMT
Wouldn't we have to duplicate significant parts of the configurations?

-- Richard

On 05.09.2013, at 22:50, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:

> how about having a jenkins-build profile, set for jenkins builds?  Then we could
> put anything we wanted into that.
> 
> I think that might be more "direct" and maintainable than turning on
> apache-release, and then somehow turning off some parts of that.
> 
> -Marshall
> On 9/5/2013 2:50 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Did you look at the Jenkins build of the SDK recently? ;)
>> 
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/UIMA-SDK/
>> 
>> Btw. I'd like to turn on apache-release on the Jenkins build
>> and just skip the gpg signing, so that we get immediate failures
>> on missing license headers and the like. Any objections?
>> 
>> -- Richard
>> 
>> On 05.09.2013, at 20:20, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> OK. I've updated the build process to produce javadocs (but only under
>>> -Papache-release, to keep development builds going faster).
>>> 
>>> Running this for the 1st time on uimaj-core produced >400 warnings... (the
>>> Javadocs on internals haven't been invested in ...)
>>> 
>>> -Marshall

Mime
View raw message