uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: UIMA Ruta next steps
Date Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:54:02 GMT
+1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes.

I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do
releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate
maintenance revisions of the last release.

-- Richard

On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:

> +1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor changes,
> especially if some of those changes might require some user action. 
> 
> -Marshall
> On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Kl├╝gl wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since the
>> new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the
>> improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the users.
>> 
>> Any opinions?
>> 
>> Peter


Mime
View raw message