uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Toepfer <martin.toep...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: Re: UIMA Ruta next steps
Date Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:08:49 GMT
+1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next release.

> Martin

> +1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes.
>
> I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do
> releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate
> maintenance revisions of the last release.
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor changes,
>> especially if some of those changes might require some user action.
>>
>> -Marshall
>> On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Kl├╝gl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since the
>>> new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the
>>> improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the users.
>>>
>>> Any opinions?
>>>
>>> Peter
>

Mime
View raw message