uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: UIMA Ruta next steps
Date Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:29:55 GMT
Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
if nobody objects.

Peter

Am 07.01.2014 19:08, schrieb Martin Toepfer:
> +1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next
> release.
>
>> Martin
>
>> +1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes.
>>
>> I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do
>> releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate
>> maintenance revisions of the last release.
>>
>> -- Richard
>>
>> On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor
>>> changes,
>>> especially if some of those changes might require some user action.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>> On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since
>>>> the
>>>> new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the
>>>> improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the
>>>> users.
>>>>
>>>> Any opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>
>


Mime
View raw message