uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:12:20 GMT
I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file.


The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of
AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but
there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of


Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>> Hi Marshall,
>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>> All rights reserved,
>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>> All rights reserved.
>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>> 1)
>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
> Sort of.  You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
> need to duplicate this).
> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>> 2)
>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
> Yes.  The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>> Thanks for your help.
> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
> -Marshall

View raw message