uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC3
Date Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:02:15 GMT
Thanks :-)

Sorry, I got really confused yesterday.

Peter


Am 20.03.2014 19:18, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> The Apache Software Foundation requires 3 or more votes by members of the PMC,
> for a release.
>
> This is a foundation-wide requirement, see
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> So, we need one more +1 vote by a PMC member.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 3/20/2014 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> We have three votes and I assume that I can close the vote now. I will
>> actually do so and continue the release process if nobody objects in the
>> next 30 minutes or something.
>>
>> I just wanted to mention it, because we had a discussion about the
>> differences between committers and PMC members, and I actually stated
>> something wrong in that discussion.
>>
>> The page about voting [1] says:
>>
>> "Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, a community-specific
>> thing. However, the basic rule is that only PMC members have binding
>> votes, and all others are either discouraged from voting (to keep the
>> noise down) or else have their votes considered of an indicative or
>> advisory nature only.
>>
>> That's the general rule. In actual fact, things tend to be a little
>> looser, and procedural votes from developers and committers are
>> sometimes considered binding if the voter has acquired enough merit and
>> respect in the community. Only votes by PMC members are considered
>> binding on code-modification issues, however."
>>
>> Our page about decisions [2] says:
>>
>> "All Contributors are encouraged to participate in decisions, but the
>> decision itself is made by those that have Committer status in the
>> Project. In other words, the Project is a " Minimum Threshold Meritocracy"."
>> "Any subscriber to the list may vote on any issue or action item.
>> However, the only binding votes are those cast by a Committer."
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>> [2] http://uima.apache.org/decisions.html
>>
>> Am 20.03.2014 15:22, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
>>> - Compare soure.zip with svn - OK
>>> - mvn clean install from source - OK
>>> - Install plugin in eclipse - OK
>>> - Run a test using new IMPORT features in eclipse - OK
>>>
>>> [x] +1 OK to release
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>> On 19/03/2014 09:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Am 19.03.2014 14:50, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to compile RUTA yesterday, but the build failed at the eclipse
>>>>> plugins. I once was able to compile everything, but I do not remember
>>>>> the exact maven configuration. Is there some documentation that I
>>>>> could look at?
>>>>>
>>>> mvn clean install on trunk should work just fine.
>>>>
>>>> What is the error message?
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19/03/2014 05:26, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Marshall!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will fix the RAT exclusions. I will take a look at the issuesFixed
>>>>>> differences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... so we need one more vote *looking around*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> compare source.zip with svn - OK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> good sig on source.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> build from source -OK (after clearing ruta* things from local
repo)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RAT excludes: has some redundancies I think (not a blocker):
>>>>>>>        src/test/resource:
>>>>>>>            org/apache/uima/ruta
>>>>>>>                action/*.* and
>>>>>>>                action/*ruta
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        duplicate src/test/resources/org/apache/uima/ruta/engine/*txt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> License / notice checked in base and in some Jars - OK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> issueFixed - shows (only) 64 issues, but Jira shows 67 issues.
>>>>>>> This is due (I think) to 3 (missing) issues being marked "Done:",
>>>>>>> "Implemented",
>>>>>>> or "Cannot Reproduce" as their resolution status.  Not a blocker,
I
>>>>>>> think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> installed plugins into Eclipse 4.3.2 , made new Ruta project
- OK
>>>>>>> (Note: doc lists explicit versions of Eclipse, doesn't include
4.3.x
>>>>>>> (includes
>>>>>>> 4.2...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looked at the staging repo for maven - OK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [x] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message