uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC3
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:01:53 GMT
Am 25.03.2014 15:57, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> I think that "Implemented" should be changed to "Fixed" in Jira. The other two are issues
that appear to be unrelated to the release because of their status. If we cannot reproduce
something, why should we mention it?
> If the "Done" is not related to the release, e.g. if it was a website change, then I
think it would also be ok not to have it in the list.

I agree, but I changed them all to fixed for this time. Maybe the names
of the issues would have been a bit misleading.


> -- Richard
> On 25.03.2014, at 15:54, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
>> Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> issueFixed - shows (only) 64 issues, but Jira shows 67 issues.
>>> This is due (I think) to 3 (missing) issues being marked "Done:", "Implemented",
>>> or "Cannot Reproduce" as their resolution status.  Not a blocker, I think.
>> Hmm... that's maybe a problem in parent-pom? It says:
>> <resolutionIds>Fixed</resolutionIds>
>> We should maybe change that. For the next release I will change the
>> resolution ids in jira.
>> Peter
>>> installed plugins into Eclipse 4.3.2 , made new Ruta project - OK 
>>> (Note: doc lists explicit versions of Eclipse, doesn't include 4.3.x (includes
>>> 4.2...)
>>> Looked at the staging repo for maven - OK
>>> [x] +1 OK to release
>>> -Marshall

View raw message