uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: something strange with Jenkins builds, test case failures
Date Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:38:48 GMT
So, try # 1 was assigned "Windows2" - a different Windows machine than used
before (in build 586).  That build
didn't even get started - while Jenkins was parsing the maven poms, it threw a
fatal "out of permgen space". 
It sounds like the Java level installed on that machine has some configuration

I restarted it, and it is assigned now to Windows1...

On 11/5/2014 10:25 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I added some debug output to record the JVM name and the specified name of the
> TransformerFactory (if any).
> I reran on Jenkins, and Jenkins picked the Ubuntu slave (failure was on
> Windows1) and I watched the console - no error reported on the xml tests.
> I've temporarily restricted the build for UIMA-SDK to "Windows" to see if I can
> reproduce this failure.
> -Marshall
> On 11/4/2014 4:43 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was watching the console log for UIMA-SDK #586, and noticed it said along the
>> way some failure indications, for instance:
>> testCAStoString(org.apache.uima.util.CasToInlineXmlTest)  Time elapsed: 0.027
>> sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> So, I was quite surprised when the build finished and sent email to this list
>> saying everything was successful.
>> Going to Jenkins test report for build # 586 here:
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/UIMA-SDK/org.apache.uima$uimaj-core/586/testReport/
>> there are no errors.
>> But looking at the console output
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/UIMA-SDK/586/console definitely shows
>> errors. 
>> (The errors seem to be due to different XML formatters; one writing <xxx  ....
>> /> and the other <xxx .... ></xxx>. Richard pointed me to a utility
to get
>> around this, and I can add that, so these won't fail.)
>> But more importantly, does anyone have any idea why one part of Jenkins (the
>> console log) is reporting failures, and the other part (test summary) is saying
>> there are no failures?
>> -M

View raw message