uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.8.1 RC2
Date Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:50:43 GMT
Peter, I build update site using -Papache-release profile on linux. So
having the path as file:/D:/work/... in artifacts.xml suggests that it
comes from some static file. I have no idea where from this originates
from. Not clear to me what creates artifact.xml.
Jerry



On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Peter Klügl <peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
wrote:

> I think the paths are coming from [1] which is used during the
> -Papache-release build.
> If the update site is build locally without profile, an absolute path of
> local workspace is set.
> I haven't found the option yet to set the name in the maven build...
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/uima/eclipse-update-site
>
> Am 10.02.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 09.02.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >> ==============================
> >> The artifacts.xml and content.xml  for the update site both have wrong
> data for
> >> the repository name.  The xml says:
> >> <repository
> >>
> name='file:/D:/work/workspace-textmarker-uima/uima-as-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/
> >> - artifacts'
> type='org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository.simpleRepository'
> >> version='1.0.0'>
> >>
> >> This looks like very old copy/paste error - because of the use of the
> word
> >> "textmarker-uima"...
> > The name is wrong for all our update sites. I just checked the uimaj and
> > ruta. The uimaj update site also mentions an really old textmarker
> > worspace I used several years ago. The ruta update site mentioned also
> > an outdated folder of an old machine. Only the names in the xmls of the
> > composite site are correct.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Peter
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message