uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving UIMA DUCC out of the sandbox?
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:46:58 GMT
Thanks to all for suggestions and comments. I will graduate DUCC from the
sandbox before the next release of DUCC (2.1.0). I'll do svn move before
RC1 is made.
Jerry

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm +1 for moving DUCC from the Sandbox - it certainly has had a lot of
> time and
> energy invested in multiple releases, and has been getting quite a bit of
> use.
> I think the community would appreciate the validation of it being a
> regular project.
>
> Re: formal voting - my view is that voting serves to catalyze consensus
> building, and it's of course also there for legal reasons (for releases).
> In
> this case, it seems pretty obvious to me that there's consensus already
> around
> moving it from the Sandbox to be a regular project; I think this is
> essentially
> mostly an SVN move, plus some publicity when it happens (tweeting :-) ,
> website
> updating, news).
>
> So, it's OK with me to proceed to move it in SVN.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 4/11/2016 11:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> > I think a formal vote with a special mail header and a 72h delay would
> > be a good thing. If somebody has reasons against moving it, it is more
> > likely that the vote is not missed and that there is enough time to
> react.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > Am 11.04.2016 um 17:32 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> >> Thanks Jerry,
> >>
> >> DUCC is not an incubator project - it is a sub-project of Apache UIMA.
> >>
> >> My understanding that for the purposes of the ASF, DUCC is already an
> >> integral part of the Apache UIMA project. That is reflected in the
> >> fact that DUCC versions do not include the "incubator" marker that
> >> ASF incubator projects have.
> >>
> >> I believe moving the project from the sandbox spot in SVN to the
> >> "regular" location is entirely our own decision - and that is all
> >> that needs to be done.
> >>
> >> On the website, DUCC is not even listed as part of the UIMA Sandbox
> >> (https://uima.apache.org/sandbox.html) but it is rather advertised
> >> as a proper part of UIMA under the "Scaleout Frameworks".
> >>
> >> We can do a formal vote, but actually I think that based on the +1's we
> >> have already and the fact that this is not an official ASF action,
> >> you can simply move it.
> >>
> >> @Marshall: what do you think?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> -- Richard
> >>
> >>> On 11.04.2016, at 17:26, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uimaee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Richard, from what I read to graduate DUCC to UIMA subproject we need a
> >>> formal vote:
> >>>
> >>> Graduation Approval Vote
> >>>
> >>> To graduate as a subproject, the Mentors
> >>> <
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor
> >
> >>> should
> >>> start a VOTE <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> thread
on
> >>> the general
> >>> list
> >>> <
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/lists.html#general+at+incubator.apache.org
> >
> >>> proposing
> >>> that the IPMC
> >>> <
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29
> >
> >>> signs
> >>> off the graduation of the podling as a subproject. This VOTEs should
> only
> >>> be started once the project has VOTEd to accept the subproject.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps we should wait until DUCC 2.1.0 is released. Looks like we are
> a
> >>> few weeks away from the release candidate. After the release I can
> formally
> >>> put DUCC graduation to a vote.
> >>>
> >>> Jerry
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uimaee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Peter Klügl <
> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 10.04.2016 um 01:11 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> how about moving UIMA DUCC out of the sandbox and promoting
it to
> the
> >>>>> same level as uimaFIT and RUTA?
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Richard
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message