uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: UIMA v3 and refactoring Resource implementation
Date Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:47:35 GMT
Here is my wishlist ;)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20Resources

DKPro Core might use external resources more if these issues were resolved.

Cheers,

-- Richard

> On 02.09.2016, at 18:02, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for starting this thread.  It would be good to collect the missing things
> people would like to see in external/shared resources. 
> 
> 1) support configuration parameters the same way Annotators do.
> 
> 2) ...
> 
> __________
> 
> Re: timeline for v3 - my guess is we'll need a "beta" release - one where it's a
> release, but users are aware some APIs might get changes, as it gets some usage
> that might reveal some design flaws we want to fix.  The beta might be early in
> 2017, and depending on how that goes, have a real release later in 2017. 
> 
> -Marshall
> 
> 
> On 9/2/2016 10:15 AM, Peter Kl├╝gl wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> I was wondering if there is a timeline/roadmap for UIMA v3.
>> 
>> 
>> I think that the external/shared resources could really use some
>> makeover, meaning that they should support the normal configuration
>> parameter concepts and not just single strings. This could be (1) quite
>> some work and could (2) break backwards compatibility. As for (1), it
>> could be realistic that I (or someone else here at Averbis) implement it
>> or help to implement it, but most likely not this year. As for (2), this
>> is probably rather reasonable for UIMA v3, which introduces a second
>> time constraint.
>> 
>> Are there any opinions on the current state of the resources? Does
>> anyone use them at all?
>> 
>> I often heard someone or myself say that they lack some expected
>> functionality. I assume that DKPro Core does not care as they solved it
>> without resources, right?
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Peter

Mime
View raw message