uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: still generating sha1 checksum - was not true
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:18:15 GMT
oops, it turns out that I saw that in my local .m2 repo entry, but that was just
left over from before, and wasn't being "generated"...  Disappeared when I
deleted that .m2 entry.


On 10/2/2018 9:54 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Re: the change to generate and "attach" artifact checksums for maven deploy.
> Have you tested this?  For the uima-wide parent-pom, that build was (for me)
> generating the sha1 checksum, although I didn't see why...  Was that behavior
> stopped?  If not, I'll poke around and see what's making those.
> -Marshall
> On 10/2/2018 7:20 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> On 2. Oct 2018, at 00:02, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>>> part of the issue seems to be that the checksum things are set up to assume the
>>> artifact follows the Maven naming conventions.  Unfortunately, the uimaj-core
>>> artifacts name their jars etc without the version part (e.g. uimaj-core, not
>>> uimaj-core-2.10.3), so the checksums don't find the artifacts...
>>> Wondering what the best fix is for this...
>> Very strange because I didn't change the patterns - only the algorithm used
>> by the Ant checksum target. So if it doesn't work now, it probably didn't work
>> before? Or the fact they are missing now is due to a change in the ASF parent POM.
>> We can use the checksum-maven-plugin to generate artifact checksums and to 
>> attach these to the Maven build such that they should be deployed to the repository
>> on release. I have filed another commit doing that under 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5856.
>> ----
>> Trying to build uima v2, I'm seeing messages such as these during the build:
>> ----
>> [INFO] --- maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (attach-javadocs) @ uimaj-test-util ---
>> [WARNING] Are you sure about the <javadocVersion/> parameter? It seems to be
>> ----
>> But I have no idea where they come from. I already tested locally upgrading to 
>> the maven-javadoc-plugin 3.0.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-512)
>> but even with that version, I get the warning. I also have no idea where the
>> 1.8.0 value would be coming from - "mvn help:effective-pom" says that the
>> "javadocVersion" parameter value is "1.7". Might be still a but in
>> maven-javadoc-plugin 3.0.1.
>> ----
>> While we are at it: Maven keeps telling me that we shouldn't use the stanza
>>   <prerequisites>
>>     <!-- 2.2.0 is broken when deploying - checksums invalid -->
>>     <!-- 2.2.1 doesn't work -->
>>     <maven>3.3.9</maven>
>>   </prerequisites>
>> in the parent pom, because that stanza is only relevant for Maven plugin modules.
>> If we want to generally enforce the use of a specific Maven version, we should be
>> using the enforcer plugin instead.
>> Is there any reason we have that stanza in the UIMA parent pom?
>> Cheers,
>> -- Richard

View raw message