velocity-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <...@intermeta.de>
Subject Re: Language Lawyer question (was: Re: syntax issue)
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:57:01 GMT
"Tim Colson \(tcolson\)" <tcolson@cisco.com> writes:

> > >> (I've previously argued we should make the entire language 
>> >> case-insensitive). 
>> >Interesting... I could go +1 for that. 
>> Why? How about a hash map that contains "foo", "Foo", "FOO" and
>> "foO". What would
>Hmm... well, for hashmap, the introspector passes verbatim whatever it
>sees (as far as I know)... so it would still probably work. 

so

$foo.xxx
$foo.XXX

are the same if this happens to be a property access and

$foo.xxx
$foo.XXX

are different if this is a hashmap access.
Now that would be "gotcha!". ;-)

	Regards
		Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

		      4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: velocity-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: velocity-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message