velocity-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Toni Lamar <toni.la...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [SURVEY] IntrospectorCache(Listener)
Date Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:27:13 GMT


Nathan Bubna wrote:
> 
> For those curious about my reasons for asking:  i'm looking at
> IntrospectorBase and the classes above and seeing slight risk of
> ConcurrentModificationExceptions in the way listeners are handled.
> This would be trivially fixed by synchronizing the add/removeListener
> methods.  However, i'm hoping to use more fine-grained synchronization
> in those classes that would require potentially more hassle than the
> risk. 
If it brings more stability and preformance, than please "cut in the code"
as "deep" as you wish :).

Even more, for huge performance increases, most users would even sacrifice
some API compatibility (since for performance, many would sacrifice this
completly by moving to other solutions :) ).

Thnx.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-SURVEY--IntrospectorCache%28Listener%29-tp18645496p18648273.html
Sent from the Velocity - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org


Mime
View raw message