velocity-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Bubna" <nbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [SURVEY] IntrospectorCache(Listener)
Date Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:06:46 GMT
Given the lack of affirmative response, i'm going to take some wild
guesses here...

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Nathan Bubna <nbubna@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Does anyone out there actually use custom implementations of the
> IntrospectorCache interface?

nope.

> 2) Does anyone use any IntrospectorCacheListeners?

no.

> 3) Can anyone give me a use-case for IntrospectorCacheListeners?  (Henning?)

yes, Henning, who is busy with other things.  Henning, if you would
like these back, i'll replace them then.  for now, i'm yanking them.
:)

>
> For those curious about my reasons for asking:  i'm looking at
> IntrospectorBase and the classes above and seeing slight risk of
> ConcurrentModificationExceptions in the way listeners are handled.
> This would be trivially fixed by synchronizing the add/removeListener
> methods.  However, i'm hoping to use more fine-grained synchronization
> in those classes that would require potentially more hassle than the
> risk.  Loads of fun, ya know.  So, if i find out the listeners are
> used w/o problems, i won't worry about it.  If i find out they're not
> used at all and can't figure out what they're good for, then i would
> happily be rid of them. :)
>
> all input is welcome!
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org


Mime
View raw message