velocity-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Velocity Tools 2.0 README has incorrect build instructions
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:17:31 GMT
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz
<chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> On 7/21/2011 12:54 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Christopher Schultz
>> <chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>> ...
>>>> All important changes not linked to the build system change have been
>>>> backported to the branch. Feel free to commit in it, we'll forward-post
>>>> changes if needed.
>>>
>>> Great. I have created an enhancement bug this morning in JIRA and I can
>>> either attach my patch and wait for comment, or simply commit to the
>>> 2.0.0 branch and wait for any objections.
>>>
>>> Which would be best?
>>
>> you are a committer.  you should commit. :)  if you have hesitations
>> or desire discussion about a change before you commit it, we have
>> dev@velocity.apache.org ready and waiting.
>
> Tomcat has a somewhat more formal review-than-commit process for
> previously-released versions (the TC5 and TC6 releases, for instance)
> but a commit-then-review process for TC7 where most of the new
> development is going. I just didn't want to commit out of turn :)

thanks for checking, but yeah most ASF projects are not as formal as
Tomcat, especially ones like Velocity where the number of active
developers is relatively small and x.x.y releases for past x.x
versions are unusual.

> I'll go ahead and commit everywhere.
>
> Thanks,
> -chris
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org


Mime
View raw message