ws-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jaliya Ekanayake" <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:25:13 GMT
Hi Paul,

The proposal starts with a "state machine model" which Mercury has come up 
So can you give little  bit more details on the state machine model that you 
are suggesting?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Daniels" <>
To: "Paul Fremantle" <>
Cc: <>; <>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal

> Hi Paul:
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
>> I have posted a proposal here:
>> Please edit, improve, or discuss.... I put this in the wiki so that it
>> could be modified.
> Hm... I thought where we'd ended up discussion-wise was that we would get 
> the Mercury code granted to Apache so that it could be examined / learned 
> from / experimented with, but that we would aim to create a "third way" as 
> the next step for both projects.
> In other words, the actual work that happens to make the new "unified" RM 
> implementation (whatever it ends up being called) would start with a clean 
> slate and take whatever it can from both Sandesha and Mercury, with the 
> goal of making sure that all the active developers are involved and 
> empowered.  Did I understand that right?
> Your proposal makes it sound rather like we're going to just start from 
> the existing Mercury code and go from there.
> --Glen
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message