ws-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What's next for WS@Apache? Discuss.
Date Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:35:41 GMT
I am on vacation. expect a few remarks on xmlschema next week.

On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com>  
wrote:

>
> Hm, mostly crickets chirping.
>
> Should we just Attic everything then? :)
>
> --G
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:08:17 -0400, Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com 
> >
> wrote:
>> Hey y'all,
>>
>> So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about...
>>
>> * Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs?
>> * Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic?
>> * What should the structure look like for what remains?
>>
>> Here's what we've got to work with.
>>
>> 1. Axiom (commons)
>> 2. Neethi (commons)
>> 3. XmlSchema (commons)
>> 4. Tcpmon (commons)
>> 5. Guththila (commons)
>> 6. JaxMe
>> 7. jUDDI
>> 8. Scout
>> 9. Muse
>> 10.Woden
>> 11.WSIF
>> 12.WSS4J
>> 13.XMLRPC
>>
>> Let's talk Attic first.  It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much
>> inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling  
>> with
>> proposals to Attic both of those.  JaxMe also seems ripe for the  
>> Attic.
>>
>> I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate  
>> together
> to a
>> new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair.  Thoughts?
>>
>> Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila?  If not, I'd suggest  
>> that
>> migrate to Axis.
>>
>> Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive?  Jochen?
>>
>> Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema,  
>> and
>> Tcpmon
>> as subprojects of WS.  I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer,
> though,
>> since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of commonly
>> useful
>> WS components.  I know other ideas have been discussed for the  
>> commons
>> stuff,
>> so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on  
>> the
>> table?
>>
>> That leaves Woden and WSS4J.  Maybe Woden should stay in WS?  As for
> WSS4J,
>> I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP.
>>
>> So... what do you guys think?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Glen
>>
>> P.S.  Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report  
>> for
> this
>> month if appropriate!

Mime
View raw message