ws-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marc Giger (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (WSS-356) Investigate signing Crypto differences
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:48:12 GMT


Marc Giger commented on WSS-356:

Hi Colm,

Do you mean the issuer crypto instance which is passed via SAMLCallback?:


My opinion is that we should leave it as it is for maximum flexibility and for "separation
of concerns".
But I don't really mind...

> Investigate signing Crypto differences
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: WSS-356
>                 URL:
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 2.0
> Is there really a need to have a separate Crypto instance to sign SAML Assertions? Maybe
we should just use the signature Crypto instance for this instead?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message