ws-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache WSS4J 2.1.4
Date Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:34:06 GMT
With 4 +1 binding votes, and 1 non-binding +1 vote, this vote passes. I'll
promote the artifacts.

Colm.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com>
wrote:

> OK, got it.
> I can live with the changes, here is my +1.
>
> Cheers
> Alessio
>
>
> On 26/10/15 12:19, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> Hi Alessio,
>
> Personally am I fine with minor (package) changes like this in the first
> few revisions of a major release like 2.1.x. After this release, 2.1.x will
> probably go into strict bug fix mode. Having said that, if you're unhappy
> with this particular change, I don't mind reverting some of the changes in
> the ws-security-dom module + respinning the release, just let me know asap!
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> OK, I asked by extending a CXF class (WSS4JInInterceptor) I was impacted
>> by the change, as one of the refactored class (WSSecurityEngine) is
>> returned in one of the WSS4JInterceptor protected methods. This said, this
>> is not a major problem to me, just wanted to be sure this was considered.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Alessio
>>
>>
>> On 26/10/15 12:01, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alessio,
>>
>> The changes are fairly minor and don't really impact on users of the
>> library, the vast majority of which will pick up the release via CXF. There
>> are no configuration changes in the release. The plan for 2.2.x is to pick
>> up JDK8, so it won't really be a minor release.
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Colm,
>>> I'm wondering if is it really ok to have package refactorings and
>>> constants moved to different class in a micro release. Are those changes
>>> really required now or perhaps they would better fit into a minor (2.2.x) ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Alessio
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/10/15 18:00, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is a vote to release Apache WSS4J 2.1.4, which is a minor bug fix
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachews-1031/
>>>>
>>>> Source release:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachews-1031/org/apache/wss4j/wss4j/2.1.4/wss4j-2.1.4-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>> Issues fixed:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS/fixforversion/12333362/
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> Colm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>>>
>>>> Talend Community Coder
>>>> http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alessio Soldano
>>> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>
>> Talend Community Coder
>> http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alessio Soldano
>> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Mime
View raw message