OK, Thanks, and I found that ws-commons-util is included in the xmlrpc
release 3, and maybe I don't need commons-logging:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 1:32 PM
To: xmlrpc-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: about commons codec
On 7/13/06, Zhou, Jing (Jing) <jingzhou@lucent.com> wrote:
> the commons-codec package is required in xmlrpc 2.0, but I find that I
> can run the xmlrpc version 3 without commons-codec , so I want to know
> whether it is redundant for xmlrpc version 3? thanks very much!
Good question. On
http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/dependencies.html
you find the commons-codec still listed. But I do believe, this is
only because commons-httpclient (which you do not need to use) lists
it as a dependency. And, even with commons-httpclient, I do not
believe, that you need it. From my point of view, the only
dependencies are:
- ws-commons-util
- commons-logging
- ws-commons-java5 (If you are using JDK <=1.4)
- xml-apis, xercesImpl (If you are using JDK <= 1.3)
Jochen
--
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the
majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
(Mark Twain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xmlrpc-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xmlrpc-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xmlrpc-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xmlrpc-user-help@ws.apache.org
|