www-mirrors mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Kenna" <andr...@stamina.com.au>
Subject RE: Mirror Update time
Date Fri, 25 Oct 2002 04:11:47 GMT
That would be unreal, but I guess the question is could that be done without opening up any
holes in apache's source code ? 


-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 2:04 PM
To: mirrors@apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror Update time

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Haesu wrote:
> Hello,
> 	I personally believe that everyone operating the mirror must run
> at least 1.3.26 or above.. I mean it would be better if all the mirrors
> are *totally secure* from any possibilities of exploits, rather than just
> cutting corners with redhat rpm updates that fix the problem w/o upgrading
> completely. Accepted, my opinion may not be 100% correct. But the reason
> for anyone to operate an official mirror is to help apache foundation to
> begin with, and I believe each mirror should be proactive in its
> responsibilities, including security.

It would be neat if we had an automated tool that could collect the
version numbers (and maybe other automatically collectible info) from
each of our mirrors.


View raw message