www-modproxy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <I...@cnet.com>
Subject RE: Reverse Proxy's
Date Thu, 10 May 2001 14:40:33 GMT
that would be it.
Thanks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Lutchansky [mailto:lutchann@litech.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:13 AM
> To: modproxy-dev@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reverse Proxy's
> 
> 
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
> 
> > I'm stepping through my code,
> > and just want to confirm it is my stupidity.
> > but do reverse proxies currently work ???
> >
> >
> > I have a line
> > ProxyPass /foo http://pma.cnet.com:80/
> >
> > which used to work, but now it seems to die with a 403 
> after the scheme
> > handler. It looks like to me that the code is going through 
> the 'proxy'
> > logic, but ignoring the r-proxy case.
> 
> If you've built mod_proxy as a loadable module, you need to 
> LoadModule the
> proxy_(http|ftp|connect)_modules as well, otherwise you get a 
> 403 error.
> 
> If you've built it statically into the apache binary, I 
> dunno...  -Nathan
> 
> -- 
> +-------------------+---------------------+------------------------+
> | Nathan Lutchansky | lutchann@litech.org |  Lithium Technologies  |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |  I dread success.  To have succeeded is to have finished one's   |
> |  business on earth...  I like a state of continual becoming,     |
> |  with a goal in front and not behind. - George Bernard Shaw      |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 

Mime
View raw message