www-modproxy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: httpd-2.0 nightly build log
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:36:55 GMT
From: "Chuck Murcko" <chuck@topsail.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:45 PM


> On Monday, August 27, 2001, at 07:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> 
> > Chuck Murcko wrote:
> >
> >> Like mid air refueling, merging proxy back into httpd will work best
> >> when both moving pieces are in sync; that's the tricky part.
> >
> > I think the best idea is to fold mod_proxy back into the httpd-2.0 tree
> > as it is now, and allow the wider exposure to uncover any problems,
> > which we will then just fix as we otherwise would anyway.
> >
> > I also think keeping a module-2.1 sandbox available for additional work
> > is a good idea. There will be an httpd-2.1 at some point in the future,
> > we can use this module-2.1 sandbox until the new development track
> > happens.
> >
> 
> Definitely +1 for keeping the cvs module regardless.
> 
> I think we're in good enough shape to merge httpd with the module-2.0 
> code. We didn't promise a fully operational cache until 2.0+ and 
> nobody's been very upset by that yet.
> 
> BillR, are you also thinking along the lines of cleaning out httpd core 
> eventually into separate repositories?

No.  https, perhaps, to accomodate multiple technical crypto issues.

We are an http server first, that's not going to move :)  Maybe a parallel
repository for HTTP/1.2, but I don't see that problem ariving for a while.

Bill



Mime
View raw message