www-modproxy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <i...@cnet.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.26?]
Date Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:42:55 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Have any of you had a chance to play with the change from using <Directory proxy:foo>
> syntax to using <Proxy foo> syntax?  Any comments from the first few days of it's
> existence?  Anyone playing with benchmarking 2.0.24 vs. cvs head on req/sec?

I was benchmarking cvs head with different pool allocation algorithms.
(and threaded/prefork) http://webperf.org/a2/v25

I'm playing with the proxies and mod-include at the moment

the only thing 'funny' I'm noticing is that the map_to_storage hook
isn't getting called for a sub-request.. this may be my code
I just noticed that 10 minutes ago,
I'm still investigating it.

> Bill
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eli Marmor" <marmor@netmask.it>
> To: <modproxy-dev@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:00 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: 2.0.26?]
>>Please look at the forwarded message from new-httpd.
>>Looks as a good time to roll a tar with Apache/proxy/APR, doesn't it?
>>It's too early to know if this tag will become a beta, but it will be
>>surely more stable than the current beta (2.0.16 or 2.0.18, I don't
>>Eli Marmor
>>CTO, Founder
>>Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
>>Tel.:   +972-9-766-1020          8 Yad-Harutzim St.
>>Fax.:   +972-9-766-1314          P.O.B. 7004
>>Mobile: +972-50-23-7338          Kfar-Saba 44641, Israel

View raw message