www-release-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move
Date Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:29:58 GMT
Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the
> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository across
to the
> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/ repository.
> >> >>> <<
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've tried using svn mv directly on a test repo (i.e. not using
a
> >> >>> workspace), and it does not seem to be possible to move multiple
files
> >> >>> at once.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Can I ask for a bit more detail on how you actually do the move?
> >
> > 1)
> > svnmucc -m logmsg -U https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/   \
> >        mv dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2         \
> >           release/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2     \
> >        mv dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc     \
> >           release/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc
> >
> > 2)
> > svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2
\
> >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc
\
> >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/
> >
> > 3)
> > svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/1.7.4/ \
> >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/
> >
> > 4)
> > svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/1.7.4/ \
> >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/1.7.4/
> >
> > Does that answer your question?
> 
> I work on the same project as you, Daniel, and even for me, that was
> certainly.... opaque.
> 
> Looks like you are providing four different alternatives to move from
> "development review" to "release". Did I get that right?
> 

Yes, I was providing four different ways to move the tarballs+signatures
from the dev/ tree to the release/ tree.

> A bit of exposition would be nice.
> 

Next time, sure.

> Thanks,
> -g

Mime
View raw message