xml-rpc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Hoegg <rho...@isisnetworks.net>
Subject Re: Automatic support of XML-RPC introspection
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:45:10 GMT

Forgive me for being rather ignorant on introspection, but is there any 
reason we want to require the XML-RPC server programmer to create public 
static fields instead of using properties?

I do not speak for the rest of the list, so I can't answer your question 
about whether we want that.

Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks

Kevin Hester wrote:

>  The listMethods/methodHelp functions use the same 'marker' system the old 
>patches did. i.e. to mark a method as public via XMLRPC, you must declare a 
>static of the form:
>	static [final] public boolean <methodName>_public = true;
>This is necessary to avoid exposing a zillion of public methods which are not 
>intended for XMLRPC.

View raw message