xml-rpc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Hoegg <rho...@isisnetworks.net>
Subject Re: Where do we go now?
Date Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:57:36 GMT
josh lucas wrote:

> 1)  Having a very small footprint.  Though I might be inclined to have 
> a 'lite' version which has the necessary compatibility with the 
> xml-rpc spec and then have a full version with outside dependencies 
> for apps which don't necessarily need a small footprint.
>
> 2) Continued xml-rpc compatibility (obviously)
>
> josh

Some requirements I'd like to see in the full version:
- HTTP/1.1 compatibility
- Customizable HTTP headers (especially User-Agent)

Other things I have seen tossed around on the list that might be useful 
are of course the introspection and interceptors pieces.

Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks


Mime
View raw message