xml-rpc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@finemaltcoding.com>
Subject Re: REPOST: https
Date Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:50:07 GMT
"John Wilson" <tug@wilson.co.uk> writes:
> I think that a standard logging interface for XML-RPC as a whole may be a
> good idea. One of the adavanatades of the Apache XML-RPC implementation at
> the moment is that you get all you need in a single download but because it
> uses SAX you can replace the parser if you prefer to use something else.
> Log4J is quite substantial (340Kb jar file) and is not everybody's choice
> for a Java logging package. I have just started to look at the Apache
> Commons Logging package which seems to offer a wrapper which allows actual
> logging implementations to be plugged in to an application and has support
> for Log4J. LogKit, JDK 1.4 and a simple file logging mechanism. has anybody
> any experience with this?

Yes.  I was actually going to suggest the use of Jakarta Commons
Logging, +1.

> I think the next MinML release should go into the XML_RPC release. This is
> mainly because I'm changing the licence to the modified BSD licence so that
> GPL users can include the MinML code.

+1, very nice!

Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>

View raw message