xml-xindice-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bent Andre Solheim" <b...@bent-andre.com>
Subject RE: Xindice 1.1b2 stability, reliability and installation.
Date Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:06:50 GMT



/Bent



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net] 
> Sent: 9. september 2003 14:17
> To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Xindice 1.1b2 stability, reliability and installation.
> 
> 
> Bent Andre Solheim wrote:
> 
> >Hi users and developers,
> >
> >I checked out Xindice 1.1b from CVS using the build-1_1_b2 tag. Was 
> >unable to make it work properly. I then checked the working version 
> >from CVS out and replaced the xindice-1.1.b2.jar from the b2 version 
> >with the new one both on the server and on the commandline tool. 
> >Everything appears to be ok.
> >  
> >
> 
> There is no 1.1b2 release. There is 1.1b1 (see 
> http://xml.apache.org/xindice/download.cgi), and there is current CVS 
> which is 1.1b2-dev
> ...

There is a 1.1b2 tag in CVS. I checked out using this. Building went
fine, but I was unable to make it work properly. The download page has
changed since I checked out, I think. Untill recently, the download page
only contained the 1.0 version, if I am not mistaken.


> 
> 
> >My question is, to both users and developers, how stable and 
> reliable 
> >is Xindice in its current state? Is it production ready? I'm 
> very close 
> >to selecting another database for my project, because it is not 
> >acceptable risking a corrupt database with a probablity not 
> very close 
> >to zero. I originally wanted Xindice as my primary data 
> store because 
> >it offers a great deal of flexibility not offered by the 
> alternatives. 
> >At the time being, I do not dare using it this way, because I cannot 
> >afford losing data or taking my service down for hours to 
> restore from 
> >backup.
> >  
> >
> 
> Why don't you perform your tests against latest CVS version? 
> If you find 
> corruption of the data, you are very welcome to file a bug into 
> Bugzilla. Currently, I don't see any open data corruption issues [1]
> 
> Vadim

I would very much like to spend time testing the newest version, but
when I first started using the database, only 1.0 was available. And my
project requires having a stable and reliable datastore. Most of the
time, the official releases are the most stable ones, so I did my test
against 1.0.

I did not file a bug because I was unable to trace the cause of the
database hanging, but it started after shutting the database down
brutally, and the bug
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22775 sounds very
familiar.

But back to my original question; do you have any opinion on how stable
Xindice is? Which release is the most stable? Can you recommend it in a
production environment?


regards
Bent
> 
> [1] 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&b
ug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=Xindice&cmdtype=doit



Mime
View raw message