xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <...@jeremias-maerki.ch>
Subject Re: Batik and memory consumption
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:15:41 GMT

On 04.11.2008 16:03:13 Lars Eirik Rønning wrote:
> I get this when trying to run with fop0.95 in my project:Exception in thread
> "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/DefaultConfiguration

That means you don't have Avalon Framework in your classpath.

>         at
> org.apache.fop.svg.PDFTranscoder.transcode(PDFTranscoder.java:172)
>         at
> org.apache.batik.transcoder.XMLAbstractTranscoder.transcode(XMLAbstractTranscoder.java:142)
>         at
> org.apache.batik.transcoder.SVGAbstractTranscoder.transcode(SVGAbstractTranscoder.java:156)
> 
> I use maven,  but this does not seem to work..

That something doesn't work when Maven is used is no news to me. That's
why I don't use Maven.

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Lars Eirik Rønning <larseirik@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > We wish to use maven.Is there any easy way to find the maven 0.95 with all
> > its dependencies?
> >
> > Thanks again.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Lars Eirik Rønning <larseirik@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi. all i do is to have my svg document include the image.When i run
> >> pdftranscoder its easting lots of ram.
> >>
> >> the version i am using at the moment is the one which is shipped with
> >> batik..
> >> Basically i use the pdftranscoder.jar file.
> >>
> >> I was unable to get it working when running with fop.jar
> >> Hope you are able to help me further.
> >>
> >> Batik1.7 is the binary distro i am using.
> >>
> >> ps.i will try what you suggested with running fop0.95
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Would you mind checking if you have a similar memory consumption if you
> >>> install FOP 0.95 and run:
> >>> fop -imagein myimage.svg -pdf myimage.jpg
> >>> ??? I'm asking since you might be running on older code that might not
> >>> efficiently process JPEG images.
> >>>
> >>> I guess it also depends what you're doing with the JPEG image. If it is
> >>> run through filter operations the JPEG image has to be decoded in memory.
> >>> If not it should theoretically not load the JPEG file into memory but
> >>> efficiently pass it into the PDF undecoded. However, if it has a color
> >>> profile, that could use up some memory.
> >>>
> >>> On 04.11.2008 13:19:26 Lars Eirik Rønning wrote:
> >>> > Hi.When i try to render a pdf from batik using jpg images of high
> >>> quality
> >>> > the memory consumption is extremely high.
> >>> > I tested this now with a 12mp image (4000*3000).
> >>> > In order to have this output the pdf correctly with the pdftranscoder
> >>> it
> >>> > needs almost 600mb.
> >>> >
> >>> > Any way  of improving this?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks guys, Batik rocks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jeremias Maerki
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >




Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message