xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From control_batik <a20022...@pucp.edu.pe>
Subject Re: adding a <g> element generates a <svg> , creating a two <svg> into a single file
Date Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:37:12 GMT

Hi Helder,
That's the point, I don't want multiple "svg" elements.
SO, I wanted to know what part of my code I have to change, for import only
a "g" element.

Can you paste the URL to your  thread , to see what I have to do.


Thanks for the answer.


Helder Magalhães wrote:
> 
>> what else , should i have to do?.
> 
> Question is: why should you want to add multiple "svg" elements? Any
> specific reason for that? Note that this may lead to a performance
> degradation and/or multiple potential issues may arise (I recall a
> recent thread regarding different transform values set to different
> "svg" elements). You might be able to accomplish what you intend
> simply using "g" elements, something I'd (seriously) suggest instead.
> ;-)
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
>  Helder Magalhães
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/adding-a-%3Cg%3E-element-generates-a-%3Csvg%3E-%2C-creating-a-two-%3Csvg%3E-into-a-single-file-tp20343192p20423360.html
Sent from the Batik - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message